Subscribe to Firm News Feed
Click to view feed. Use link to set up a RSS reader subscription to WCSR.com's feeds. See Blogs/RSS page for instructions.

News Article

Holly Svetz Writes Article on Compliance Issues for Government Contractors

November 12, 2010

  • Print
About Site Tools
TYSONS CORNER, VA.—Does your company or organization fall under the umbrella of being a government contractor? You may think you know the answer—but you might be surprised.
 
Veteran government contracts attorney Holly Emerick Svetz has written a new article entitled “You Say You Aren’t a Government Contractor—Or Is It Just Wishful Thinking?” The article helps companies assess whether or not they fall under the laws and regulations governing contractors and subcontractors providing goods or services to the government. Attorney Steve Cave assisted Svetz in preparing the article.
 
The article appears in the current issue of “Focus on WMACCA,” a publication of the Washington Metropolitan Area Association of Corporate Counsel.
 
Holly Emrick Svetz has more than 15 years of experience as a government contracts attorney. As a former U.S. Air Force engineer, she has a particular interest in technology-related contracts, research and development grants and other agreements. She represents clients in bid protests and claims litigation at the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals, Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Government Accountability Office, Small Business Administration Office of Hearings and Appeals, and Virginia and District of Columbia state and federal courts. Svetz also is a frequent author and presenter on government contracting issues. She practices in Womble Carlyle’s Northern Virginia office.
 

This document is intended as an informational reminder and does not constitute legal advice. If you have any questions or would like to discuss a particular situation, please contact Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, LLP. The purpose of this article is to provide general information about significant legal developments and should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts and circumstances.